Here is our full review of the 24-35mm f/2 DG HSM Art Lens from Sigma.
24-35mm f/2 for Canon EF: http://bhpho.to/1DQNzO2
24-35mm f/2 for Nikon F: http://bhpho.to/1Tx2kg3
24-35mm f/2 for Sigma SA: http://bhpho.to/1Ne4psk
Shot on Canon 5D Mark iii: http://bhpho.to/1f0t5qe
Follow Me on Twitter http://bit.ly/PKP8jD
Add us on google + http://bit.ly/SK83hi
Like us on our Facebook Page http://on.fb.me/HJGIoy
Amazon Auto Links: No products found.
With this range, this is not a zoom lens. Ridiculous …
there is any wide angle full frame with more aperture or same even closer ??
…i really like to have one of those but art series lenses of sigma was a bit pricey
First comment! Yay! Good video!
Gauss bokeh, no, thanks.
What’s the focus throw like?
Tôi muốn sigma 24/70 art được bán ở vietnam
star test of a lens for aberrations Sigma 24-35mm F2 DG HSM Art https://www.flickr.com/photos/133665080@N06/
I use the 18-35mm 1.8 on Full Frame. Usable 28-35mm.
Is this lens weather resistant?
2nd commentt double yeaaahhhhh……:p
3rd!
Nikon 150-500 mm
+1 @lorisgerber Oh no! It’s a little darkness in the corners…what shall I do?!
what do you think 35mm f1.4 or this one which one is the best selection
so basically its a 24mm/35mm art lens combine together as one nice…
one of the first comments
Why are all testers caring about a litte bit of vignetting?
At the end, the most photographers would probably add vignetting to their photos, because it looks great!
does this work with the new a7riii with the metabones adapter?
I would open this, take the lenses out and shake them a bit.
I cannot find a reason to have any use for this lens. 1) its expensive 2) If i want to do astrophotography id rather buy a 24 1.4. That extra stop of light means I can go from 1600 iso to 800 iso. 3) If I want an ultra wide angle zoom, 16 – 35 range is better. 24 is never really in ultra wide territory. 4) And If i want a normal walk around lens 24 – 105 or 24 – 70 at least gets to the short telephoto range. Yes the 24-35 might be a sharp lens, but it is expensive ($1000) and not very useful in real world conditions. You also cannot compare this to a prime because it has 18! elements. That much glass has a negative effect on microcontrast and tonality.
I’m looking into getting the 35mm 1.4 Art; however, I’m also debating about getting the 24mm Art. Would this lens get rid of that problem? I don’t mind losing 2/3 of a stop, the only thing I’m worried about is the IQ compared to the primes
I’m here because I’m wondering if the Sigma 18-35 1.8 will ruin my Cannon Mark 3. I saw a comment that says it is just for crop sensor cameras. Please help.
Maybe Canon should release a 33-35mm 1.4 and call it the fastest zoom lens
8:07 Spell check – Quiet ( not quite )
I’m just teasing. I have always enjoyed your honesty in your videos. I own a 18-35 f1.8 and it turns my camera into “god” ( minus image stabilization ). Keep killing it Sigma! Canon and Nikon are gonna stop making lenses all together if you keep this up!
hi waaj
why would ppl buy this when they have 18-35mm f1.8? With better zoom range and faster aperture, thats clearly better than this lens. Although 18-35 lens is aps-c lens, it is still usable on full frame except on wider angles.