TAMRON 70-210 f4 Lens Review | Best Budget Telephoto Lens?

This is a review of the Tamron 70-210 f4 VC lens. I took it out to get you sample images so you can decide for yourself wether or not the lens is the right choice for you.

Download sample RAW files shot with this Lens right here http://froknowsphoto.com/tron70210/

Download MyGearVault https://mygearvault.com/#download

Where I get all the Royalty Free Music for my videos https://goo.gl/nvTxie Epidemic Sound. Get a 30 day trial right here.

Please help us continue to make FREE content by purchasing one or all of the FroKnowsPhoto Educational guides. To check out previews of each guide click here.

The Gear I use the most

I love my Nikon D5 http://amzn.to/2xnehyD
My New Favorite Camera Nikon D850 http://amzn.to/2hi2xnP
My absolute FAVORITE camera bag ever http://bit.ly/2scQRt7
Where I get my RAW T-Shirts http://bit.ly/2vG2igB
The Microphone I use for Vlogging http://amzn.to/2fjb8K5
Wireless Microphones I recommend http://amzn.to/2yqe24y
My FAVORITE Portrait and Sports Lens http://amzn.to/2xmPafq

Follow me on
YouTube: http://bit.ly/frotube
Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/FroKnowsPhoto
Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/jaredpolin/
Twitter: https://twitter.com/froknowsphoto

Get The FroKnowsPhoto Guide To Building Your Online Presence FREE right here as a download http://froknowsphoto.com/branding

USE CODE FRO at http://squarespace.com/fro to get your 14 day FREE Trial.


NWP4440 says:

Definitely an option for me. I do 95% of my work outdoors, so it’s a real tasty option to me.

Ankur Tripathi Photography says:

Y not buy canon l series F4 which is sharp and cheap

Wasin Silakong says:

We dont need the warranty card

Max Shean says:

Can’t do anything wrong with a used Canon F4 L IS version. A lot older but I cannot see an advantage of the Tamron here.

boehseryappi says:

I have the Nikon 70-200 F4 VR and im happy with that
(took the cashback and trade-in my old Sigma 70-200 F2.8 non OS – so the price was ok for me)
A comparison from that Tamron to the F4-Nikkor Version would be interesting for me

Superuser TechMods says:

That’s always my fav part, don’t need this won’t use that lol

Alberto 9324 says:

im chilling with my $99 olympus 40-150 f4-5.6 lens

Thomas K. Villadsen says:

I mostly shoot landscapes and nature, so I bought this instead of the 2.8, mostly due to the weight. I’m very happy with it, I think it’s a fine lens in very good quality. But as you say, the zoom ring furthest from the body, is a bit stupid.

rfluharty says:

You said that on a crop sensor it was still a f/4? I thought that when you went a crop sensor the effective focal length is multiplied by the crop factor as well as the aperture, which would make it an f/6. Is that incorrect?

Anthony Augeri says:

Can you do a challenge using a Nikon D7000 at a low light event that has a lot of fast moment?

Nick SAM says:

F4 not enough for me. SORRY guys =.=

Benjamin Cornwell says:

I really enjoyed this review as it confirmed many of the things I was hoping for about this lens and I will definitely consider buying it!

Chidvilas Prem says:

What is vc?

Samuel Graves says:

PLEASE tell me you added the vignetteing in post!

Jefferson Steelflex says:

Im looking to buy a zoom lens (250$ budget) is the TAMRON 18-200mm f/3.5-6.3 Di II VC any good?

VincentHannon says:

I am less enthusiastic about this product. I think it’s neither fish nor fowl. The question I feel is there so much difference between it and the 70-300 at a fifth of the price. And if you bought the 70-200 from six years ago for the same price.

Calvin Corrigan says:

why not the 28-400

neofelis BASS says:

Which is better the VC on the Tamron 70-210 f/4 or the IS of the Canon 85mm f1.4?

Chris Hall says:

Landscape togs take note, this ones for you!

Jay P says:

Been really digging this lens. Love the size, function and quality.

StormBlåst says:

Now that 28-75 f2.8 is out for Sony E-mount I wonder if they are gonna release something like this but f2.8 soon…

Phillip Farano says:

Where is the review..????

yuri886 says:

Great review , I have it and I like it , another bonus is the zoom Is internal!

Lawrence Tellez says:

This is a really nice lens I got day one it’s very sharp I shoot landscapes.

Stan KMT says:

I own that lens. Hecking amazing of a lens for $799!

P Hibon says:

I own the Nikon 70-200 / f4. This lens is tack sharp and I would definitely recommend it over the Tamron (if you can provide the funds)! Since I’m a landscape photographer I don’t need the f2.8 persé, although it would be great especially when attaching a TC to it. However, the 70-200 f2.8 is a bit too expensive for me.

Tech 101 says:

*Idea : Photo session with my GF as the model*

Who’s agree with me?

Johnny4eyes says:

I went with Canon’s 70-200 F/4 IS after multiple considerations:
– Canon’s 2.8 costs a mint.
– Tamron’s 2.8 has almost equal image quality from all reviews and is much cheaper. But weighs a ton, wouldn’t be fun to hike with.
– I primarily shoot nature & landscapes so I don’t really need F/2.8.
– Tamron’s F/4 is cheapest with VC but other tech reviews show significant distortion & slight softness compared even to Tamron’s F/2.8, NM the Canon offerings.
– Canon’s F/4 has IS, very portable, good price, and image quality is highly comparable to the F/2.8 which is widely renowned.
So unless you REALLY need F/2.8 (e.g. portraits or indoor sports) I’d go with the best F/4 that fits your needs & your camera.

Nikhlesh Verma says:

Thank you Jared, I was looking for the review of this lens from you.

okokok i know says:

you forgot one MAJOR ability of this lens. you kinda showed it, but didn’t mention the fact that this lens has a great close focusing distance for higher magnification. the lens also stops down to f32, so that paired with the reproduction ratio can make for some great shots. o yeah, the tamron 1.4 and 2x extenders keep just about the same focus distance. 1:3.1 alone, 1:2.2 with the 1.4, and 1:1.6 with the 2x. the iq holds great too. i’ve had this lens since it got to the store, and i’m having a hard time wanting to change up. i don’t think i have ever mentioned bokeh before, but this lens is pretty fn dope. this lens has very good qualities around the board…..highly recommended.

fallen1102 says:

“105mm-315mm on crop sensor at f/4” but it would actually be 105 to 315 at f/6…

Steven Rix says:

More wind tunnel tests please.

 Write a comment


Do you like our videos?
Do you want to see more like that?

Please click below to support us on Facebook!