There are some seriously mega-pricey white L-lens tele lenses around, but we look at Canon’s EF 300mm f/4L USM(http://bit.ly/300mm-f4), which we think might be the best tele lens available for the money.
Pricing Reference:
http://www.digitalrev.com/product/canon-ef-300mm-f-4/MzY_A
Connect with us:
==================================
Facebook: http://facebook.com/digitalrev
Twitter: http://twitter.com/digitalrev
Google+: http://google.com/+digitalrev
Instagram: http://instagram.com/digitalrev
Flickr: http://flickr.com/digitalrev
DigitalRev: http://digitalrev.com/digitalrev
Fancy Reading?
==================================
Bokeh by DigitalRev: http://bokeh.digitalrev.com
The fresher and funner photography read
Watch More DRTV Videos
==================================
http://tv.digitalrev.com
Join DigitalRev Social and share your photos:
==================================
http://digitalrev.com/signup
http://digitalrev.com/discover
Shop DigitalRev Online Store:
==================================
http://digitalrev.com/shop
Amazon Auto Links: No products found.
Hi there,
First of all, I would like to thank you for all the tips and the tutorials that have been very helpful for us all.
Secondly, I would ask a favor, to review “tamron 70-300mm f 4-5.6 di vc usd” if possible, as I have heard it is a very good telephoto lens with excellent VC, and I am not able to find a decent review on youtube about it.
Hoping to have this review from you real soon.
Regards.
If i ever saw you with that i would steal off of you and take your shit lol
Hei Kay, are going to Test the Canon 400mm f/5.6 too? it seems to bee a very good and cheap Wildlife Lens..
fix the title digrev jeeze
Im thinking Canon 100-400mm f/4.5-5.6L IS II USM or Canon 300mm f/4L USM which one better??
This one is my first time to see you using lace on the camera.
I think the Nikon equal to this lens is over $5000 🙁 I wonder if you can buy a Canon to Nikon converter? LOL
would it be good with the 70D? (looking for a 400+ focal length so asp c is the cheaper option)
Please review tue Canon EF 400mm f5.6L.
lensa dipake coli
1:11 ‘water’ is a bit of a loose term…
https://www.facebook.com/daruuoshsuperzoom/?ref=aymt_homepage_panel
will this be a good tele lens for bird photography with used on 7d mark 2? and a tele converter 1.4
Can you guys review a super tele that isn’t canon?
“subscribers going down” well… atleast u(kai) noticed now, before its too late
please should i sell my canon 300 f4 for wild life and get the 300 f2.8 and 2.8 tokina 80 to 200 zoom the tokina lens are non os
What a Wanker
p please should i sell my canon 300 f4 for wild life and get the 300 f4 and 2.8 tokina 80 to 200 zoom the tokina lens are non os
Could you make a quick hand-on video for latest canon ef-s 24mm f2.8 lens?
Have you looked at the Tamron 70-300 VC? It’s a really great lens with an amazing VC. 1 out of 3 times I got a tack sharp photo 300mm at 1/8 sec (I’m an archer….) On Photozone the sharpness test is higher than this canon prime. It’s cheap too.
I enjoy your videos!
in the end kai was jerking it
My heart is set on the 400mm L, but this 300mm is 1/2 stop faster and comes with IS which the 400mm lacks. Still, for birding and other type of nature photography, I need that extra 100mm reach. Yeah I can always slap on a TC, but then I would lose a stop and I would be dealing with a 5.6 lens and no AF unless I tape the pins, which to me (taping the pins) is a bit radical. .
Could you maybe fix the title and also add IS into it? There is also a non-IS version of this lens.
p please should i sell my canon 300 f4 for wild life and get the 300 f2.8 and 2.8 tokina 80 to 200 zoom the tokina lens are non os
6:21 aw yeah feel my e-penis
why dont they spray that lens black or somthing ,than that ugly aged white.
That cough at 3:37 though.
6:25 its fapping time…
I like the Jason Bourne sequence & soundtrack
Friends what is the difference between 70-300mm and just 300 mm lens. . Which one is better suitable for all occasion ?
what does usm means
Chinese Father Christmas!
This is the 1st lens I got when I got into photography back in 2008. I got this lens and the 70-200 f4 for $500. Can you believe that? I jumped on the deal so fast. An older gentleman was trying to get rid of them. I sold the 70-200 for $600 a couple years ago (man what a sharp lens). I am keeping this 300 as it’s so light, close focuses and takes very nice portraits at f4 and as this video shows, it’s great for street work – keep your distance from your subject.
Dope video checkout what we have going on at my Channel … Just did some work with Jadakiss and Lil Durk…
Barry sniping; love it lol
“best tele fot the money” *clicks link* has a 1 star rating lol
Spelling error, Actually this is a review for the Canon 300mm f/4L IS USM!!! which goes for about $1500; not the Canon 300mm f/4L USM, which roughly goes for between 700 to 850 in North America’. The title is missing the “IS”.