ZEISS Batis 25 f/2 Lens Review (Sony E-Mount)

ZEISS Batis 25 f/2 lens – now in stock! http://amzn.to/292XkOL
A Great CASE for the BATIS 25: http://amzn.to/292VsFR

SONY STUFF:
Sony a6000 http://amzn.to/1Y2oIvI
Sony A7ii http://amzn.to/1pOaLGI
Sony A7rii http://amzn.to/1Y2pR6y

Sigma 19mm f2.8 (new version) http://amzn.to/24ErDzQ
Sigma 19mm f2.8 (old version) http://amzn.to/24ErMU0
(Note: Don’t pay more than $199 for this lens!)

NIKON STUFF:
Nikon 35 f1.8 DX http://amzn.to/1pzNs3n

Nikon D500 (PREORDER) http://amzn.to/21gsvrP
Nikon D750 http://amzn.to/21gsBQk

Nikon 300mm f4 AF-S http://amzn.to/1MAHFhI
Nikon 200-500mm f5.6 http://amzn.to/1MAHOC1
Large lens APE CASE: http://amzn.to/1MR2Qmc

Smartphone Tripod Adapter (w/ FREE Hand Grip) http://amzn.to/1SxLQCV

Color Coded Neoprene Lens Cases
BLACK (with RED top!) http://amzn.to/1peITe4
BLUE lens cases http://amzn.to/1WcZPif
BROWN lens cases (Because of You!) http://amzn.to/1WcZU5z
GREY lens cases http://amzn.to/23Iumud
PINK (Not that there’s anything wrong with that) http://amzn.to/1WDD3k2
ORANGE (one case) http://amzn.to/1peJ5Ki
YELLOW (one case)http://amzn.to/1WDDrzd

Comments

Andy Tu says:

The sony GM lens have 3d pop too. 😀
I have this lens, I like it, but I kind of not like the build of it. It feels like it would break if I dropped it lol. THe lens hood and cap is so brittle feeling.

Enrique says:

Does the quality of the photograph (or end result) justify the price difference between this lens and the Sony 28mm?

muffemod says:

Your french accent is atrocious.

Arturo Serrana says:

Hi — would you recommend this over the Zeiss 16-35mm f4 as a travel lens?

thanoszev says:

How would you compare this lens to the sony 28mm ??

Abishake Rakthey says:

Hey.. Batis 25/2.. I saw some complaints about Vignetting in full frame sensor. Can you please verify. sony 28/2 or batis 25/2 for professional use? is it worth the extra money? Thanks for the help.

holsteincowboy says:

Excellent review.Will you be reviewing the new Batis 18mm sometime?

Jess Demant Aggeboe says:

Great review …..

n3qdz says:

Ya get what you pay for! That the pain of price up front and you will never be let down……ever! Oh what’s special in the lense…..unicorn horn dust, very hard to get. Nice as always review Sean! That glass really makes that Sony sing!

Henrik Bruun says:

what happened to your camera, is it repaired with duck tape on the front and top. – another great review, i resently bought the sigma 19 2.8 on your recommendation in the video. thanks – keep them coming.

Thomas Müller says:

this is not a LED is an OLED… 😉

clash of clan fun fans says:

please make some videos about video quality and image quality of a6300 or a6500 with batis 25 and 85 lenses

Achilleas Labrou says:

Zeiss is
Nice
and you gonna pay a
Price

wandererstraining says:

I am lucky enough to have one, and I completely agree. It’s a beautiful lens, and one of the most obvious things to me is how much the colors pop. It’s also a good astro lens, but there is quite a bit of vignetting. But man, the sharpness and the colors, wow! The colors especially. The images are so nicely saturated.

NETVO TV says:

How long can the OLED last? can it last as long as the lens? A youtuber say the internal is some part made from plastic! So not last long? Can’t last a life time? Oh my! DIdn’t thought about this! Still recommend? 25mm or 18mm Batis or 21mm Loxia from Zeiss?

Tim Combes says:

Totally concur with assessment of Zeiss lenses. Good report! Thank you.

Miklos Nemeth says:

This review was so revelational that it has changed my view of photography gear.

Ceri Rust says:

Love your reviews, thanks
🙂

Bruno Deserto says:

Very interesting review!

TerryJ Photography says:

Question, hope you can help. I Just purchased Sony a6500, and I’m trying to decide between the Zeiss 25mm f/2 or the 55mm f/1.8 for best all round lens. I can only choose 1, any advice will be greatly appreciated. Thanks

Adrian Pocea says:

i never understood why do you have to pay so much for a wide angle prime, even of superior quality, especially if you are not making money out of it. Everything south of 35 mm is designed , in my view, for landscape shots (because in architecture you cannot do real, paid for work without a tilt shift lens so you don’t have distortion). here you are with a 2000 dollars lens on uour camera, shooting who knows what, beaches and ducks and general things, and here comes your niece, who assumes that , with that lens and that camera. you gonna take a much better picture of her than her iphone. and here you are, explaining her that this lens is not designed for portraits, that is has a really bad look with the faces in closeups, and you wish you had a normal cheap 50 mm with you…i know a lot of people in the Canon world that bought the famous 24mm L 1.4 for a ton of money, realizing after a while that they are not using it

 Write a comment

*

Do you like our videos?
Do you want to see more like that?

Please click below to support us on Facebook!